L'Ultima Settimana a Roma

Week nine began with late seventeenth century illusionistic ceilings. We met on the steps of the Gesù for a second visit to the church, this time to discuss Gaulli's impressive illusionistic ceiling, combining painting, sculpture and architecture. Our reading on the work prompted us to consider Bernini's influence over the commission and the execution. We thought about the effect this breaking of space would have had on the seventeenth century viewer and we discussed the motivations for the Jesuits to utilize such visually powerful decoration in their primary church.

We continued the day with a visit to Sant' Ignazio, another Jesuit church. John led us in a discussion of Andrea Pozzo's Apotheosis of Saint Ignatius. We attempted to view the amazingly convincing perspective as a seventeenth century viewer to determine if the Jesuits were utilizing such decorative schemes as propaganda. We discussed the use of that word and its often negative connotations. We tried to consider the meaning of propaganda outside our own perception of its implications. We also had the opportunity to read about and observe the practical, mechanical and logistical methods by which these painters created these ceilings. We were actually able to see the holes in the ceilings that were created by the type of scaffold invented for such purposes.

On Tuesday we wrapped up Art H 397 with a trip to the Esposizione Universale Roma, the EUR. Lucienne orchestrated this entire visit, from the bus route, to the sites, right down to a well-timed caffe' stop. We ended our survey of Roman art by considering Mussolini's attempts to create a new, third Rome on the outskirts of the city. Lucienne walked us through Mussolini's decorative program that consistently recalled ancient Roman monuments in an updated and modern fashion. We grappled with the question of whether this conceived city was and is a successful "Third Rome."

Wednesday and Thursday were the group's last days in Rome. The students completed their finals for both Art H 497 and Art H 397. They spent their free time studying for examines, packing up their apartments, and trying to fit in all those final must-do's before leaving Rome. Our next stops: Florence and Venice.

Bernini, Bernini, Borromini, Bernini

This was the week of Bernini. But not only Bernini. We began our eighth week with a trip to St. Peter's. We donned our headsets and braved the crowds. We first considered the impact of Bernini's Baldacchino, realizing that his evocation of ephemeral structures serves still to frame the cathedra of St. Peter and to anchor the viewer in the vast space of the basilica. We proceeded to the crossing of the church where Professor (Estelle) Lingo led us in a discussion of the four colossal sculptures. Bolgi's St. Helena, Mochi's Veronica, Duquesnoy's St. Andrew and Bernini's St. Longinus were subject to much debate over which sculpture best fulfilled the goals of the Council of Trent. We ended our St. Peter's visit with a selection of papal tombs from the seventeenth century.

On Tuesday we went to one of the most lovely museums in the world, the Galleria Borghese. Located in the pristinely beautiful Villa Borghese, this reasonably sized collection must be viewed with a timed two hour entrance. Dabney presented Bernini's Apollo and Daphne, helping us to reconstruct the sculpture's original placement within the palazzo and its relationship to the paragone debate. We then had a little under 45 minutes to dash through the galleries taking in the Raphaels, Caravaggios, Correggios, Canovas, etc.

Wednesday was a three site day on the Quirinale hill. We began the morning at one of Bernini's most famous small commissions, the Cornaro Chapel in Sta Maria della Vittoria. Lori presented this exquisite chapel and proposed an entirely new and provocative set of inspirations for this highly polemical work.

We then proceeded to walk down the street to Borromini's San Carlo alle Quattro Fontane. Katie led us in a discussion of Borromini's use of classical architectural elements to disrupt the viewer's expectations for a church interior. Borromini managed to create an intricate interior out of very little space, accomplishing this using only white stuccoed architectural decoration.

Next came the stark contrast to Borromini's San Carlino, Bernini's Sant' Andrea al Quirinale. Theresa presented this site, walking us through Bernini's manipulation of the viewer's experience through his distinct choices in architecture, sculpture and painting. We contrasted Bernini's "jewel box" of colored marble and gilded bronze with Borromini's elegant simplicity and geometric forms.

By Thursday our 300-level class had transitioned out of the seventeenth century and into the realm of the Grand Tour. Gina led us in an early morning discussion of the Trevi Fountain. She asked us to consider the presence of mythological figures on a papal commission celebrating this water source. We continued our day with a trip to the Museo di Roma to look at eighteenth century Italian art. We were some of the only people in this interesting and important museum, attesting to the dearth of interest in the period. However we found it fascinating looking at Pompeo Battoni's Portrait of John Staples, attempting to piece together the Grand Tourist's attitude toward eighteenth century Italy. Just to prove our professors' point about this periods lack of public interest, one of the museum guards fell asleep and snored loudly throughout our visit.

Another rich week in Rome.

The Villas

Week seven of the program began with another day dedicated to Caravaggio. We met on the steps of Sant' Agostino in the morning to discuss the Augustinian's relationship to poverty, humility and pilgrimage. We discussed how these factors played a specific role in both the conception and the reception of Caravaggio's Maddona di Loreto inside. We continued the day's discussion with a trip to Santa Maria del Popolo. Maria led us in an examination of Annibale Carracci and Caravaggio in confronto in the Cerasi Chapel. Maria's visual assignment for us was to consider the ways in which Caravaggio and Annibale were looking at and responding to the other's different painting practice within the confined space of the chapel.

On Tuesday we embarked on our third and final day trip. We met our bus at 8AM and headed to Tivoli, the location of two important sites: Hadrian's Villa and the Villa d'Este. Denver was our guide to Hadrian's massive second century CE imperial retreat. We focused our discussion of the villa on the so-called Maritime Theater. Denver's task was to persuade us based on her research that this small man-made island within the greater complex served as the center of the villa and the other buildings were conceived in relation to it. We were then able to wander the ruins for the next couple of hours, visiting whichever parts of the villa interested us most.

We ate our lunches on the bus on the way to our next site, Villa d'Este. As one of our resident landscape experts, Kelsey was well equipped to lead us through the Renaissance gardens. She summarized the patron's desire to create a Rome away from Rome through his use of water works and a specific sculptural program. Kelsey asked us to consider the manipulation of space and axiality as we wandered from the main entrance to the gardens up to the palazzo above. Moving through gardens and up the stairs, we were never presented with a clear path to follow; instead we were prompted to move through the winding paths, encountering the villa's many installations and fountains.

Wednesday continued our theme of villa's and private spaces, but this time a little closer to home. We crossed the river and met at the Villa Farnesina. Kristin presented Raphael's Loggia of Cupid & Pysche. With our day at the Vatican fresh in minds, we discussed Raphael's update on Michelangelo's Sistine ceiling. Kristin led us through the narrative of Cupid and Pysche, noting that several key scenes were left out of the story in Raphael's conception. Kristin concluded that the narrative was addressing the mischief of Venus rather than the love story of Cupid and Pysche. We noted the differences in this ceiling, which was commissioned for a private residence. We compared it with that which we had seen in the religious spaces of the Vatican.

Following our trip to the Farnesina, we headed back to the classroom to discuss the Farnesina's counterpart across the river, Palazzo Farnese. We compared Annibale Carracci's Loves of the God's to Raphael's loggia. We went on a virtual tour of the ceiling, sorting out the levels of reality Annibale incorporated into his ceiling depicting the escapades of the gods. We grappled with the question of patronage, attempting to determine how this program functioned for a religious patron situated in a private space.

Thursday wrapped up our week with a day of seventeenth century painting. Our morning began early with a visit to SS. Trinità dei Pellegrini. This church is often not open in the morning, but we arranged to slip in right after the 8:30 mass. We were able to spend a long time in silence looking closely at Guido Reni's Trinity altarpiece. It was particularly rewarding to be able to view this altarpiece in its original setting, helping us to understand how Reni communicated an abstract concept, such as the Trinity, through light and color.

After SS. Trinità dei Pellegrini, we traveled by bus to San Gregorio Magno. We had the Oratory of St. Andrew all to ourselves with Domenichino's the Scourging of St. Andrew on one side and Guido Reni's St.Andrew Led to Martyrdom on the other. This was an ideal "classroom" setting to consider the different compositional approaches of these two contemporary painters. We debated over which was more effective in conveying the narrative of story, framing the discussion that the visual arts were searching for a new pictorial language in post-Tridentine Rome.

After our official class session was over, our professors offered to take any interested students to the Case Romane, an excavation site of ancient Roman houses near to San Gregorio Magno. We were able to see remnants of both pagan and early Christian wall paintings. It was a reminder to us that we are constantly moving through spaces that have been inhabited for millennia. Good week.

Mochi, Musei, & Michelangeli

Week six began with a bang. On Monday we piled into a bus for our second day trip. We made our way north into Umbria to Orvieto. After riding the funicular, grabbing cappuccini and chocolate, we wove through the narrow streets to the Duomo. Our trip to the Duomo focused on Luca Signorelli’s Cappella Nuova. It was the first time we had the opportunity to consider Christian commissions outside of Rome, and the Last Judgment scenes set us up nicely for our trip to the Vatican on Wednesday. The highlight of Orvieto was visiting the Museo del Duomo and seeing Mochi’s Annunciation Group. With a Mochi expert in our professorial ranks, we had a chance to consider the innovative skills and unique narrative choices Mochi brought to this sculpture group. The sculptures have been removed from their original placement inside the Duomo of Orvieto. While it is unfortunate that we do not get to see them in their original setting, we were lucky to be able to view the sculptures all the way around, for as long as we wanted, and completely undisturbed.

Orvieto is so lovely that a day never seems long enough. This day was no exception, but we had another important site on the agenda: Civita di Bagnoregio. Civita is located on the top of a mesa in a valley near to Orvieto. One can only access the tiny town via a very steep footbridge. There are no cars and no public transportation, but there is a bruschetteria, which was our destination. The owners of the bruschetteria treated us to a snack of fresh bread, pomodori, and delicious olive oil that is made on site. The bruschetta was cooked on an open air fire that gave the tiny trattoria a cozy warmth and comforting smell. No one was ready to leave when it was time to go.

Monday was a long long day so we took it a little easier on Tuesday. We met in the classroom to discuss Raphael, Michelangelo and Bramante’s contributions to New St. Peter’s. This day was largely in preparation for our Vatican visit. We were able to spend a good deal of time looking at some slides of images that we would not be able to access as easily at the Vatican.

Wednesday. Vatican Day. We met at the entrance to the museum at 9:30 and were promptly ushered into the madness. Luckily we were connected with headsets so we were able to hear our professors over the buzz of the crowds as they guided us through the vast and overwhelming papal collections. We first made our way through the antiquities, to the Belvedere courtyard, and then the Belevedere sculpture collection. Many of the students were overwhelmed and excited to see some “old friends” for the first time. The Apollo Belvedere and the Laocoön were particular favorites. We fought our way through the crowds into Raphael’s Stanze and finally to the Sistine Chapel. Working with Michelangelo for so much of our two courses, this moment had special significance for all of us, despite the roves of tourists and ornery museum guards. Lunch was an absolute necessity after this milestone. Following lunch and caffè in the cafeteria, we continued on to the Pinacoteca. We focused mainly on Raphael’s Transfiguration and the collection of seventeenth century paintings in the subsequent rooms. All in all Vatican Day totaled eight hours in the museum. Exhausting, but worth every single minute.

On Thursday our mega-week continued with a visit to the Caravaggio show taking place in Rome right now. We met in the classroom early in the day to discuss our readings on Caravaggio and to set up some of the issues regarding the artist. We then took a break and reconvened up on the Quirinale in the afternoon for our entrance to the exhibit. During the show we were set loose amongst the 10 rooms of works to look and observe on our own. We naturally ended up forming small discussion groups and moved through the exhibit more or less together. These groups pointed details out to one another and discussed the issues of representation we had established in class earlier in the day.

This was probably our fullest week yet, but it was extremely rewarding and established a momentum for the next half of the quarter.

La Quinta Settimana

Week five began with new religious orders and ancient saintly bodies. We started Monday morning off with a trip to the Gesù. Mara gave a presentation on the changing organization of the church space under the direction of the Jesuit order. We compared the lay-out and facade with that of the Renaissance and early Christian spaces we have already encountered. We then moved on from architectural to imagery with Vicki leading us in a consideration of the early painted chapels of the church. In the chapel of the Madonna della Strada, a fragment of a fourteenth century fresco has been preserved and hung on the wall as though it is an icon. This refashioning of an art object as an icon fit nicely into our continuing examination of the changing religious image.

After the Gesù, we ventured across the river, via Tiber Island, to Santa Cecilia in Trastevere. Lauren presented on Stefano Maderno's sculpture of Saint Cecilia, situated in the high altar of the church. The sculpture was meant to be a representation of the early Christian saint upon the rediscovery of her body in 1599. When uncovered, she was said to be miraculously preserved 1200 years after her death. As a group, we discussed the function of an object as a replica of a miraculous relic and considered the transference of holy power from the body to the sculpture.

On Tuesday the undergraduates had their midterm for our 300-level course. As per usual, everyone performed well. Two exams down, two to go!

Wednesday we walked up Corso Vittorio Emanuele to Santa Maria in Vallicella. We were lucky enough to have a Barocci specialist guiding our ranks to lead us through the artist's conception of the Visitation. The more time we spent looking at this highly conceived work, the more we began to notice about Barocci's use of color, composition and meaning. We then turned to Rubens' high altar for one of our first tastes of the emerging differences between the sixteenth and seventeenth centuries. We were particularly fascinated by Rubens' drastically different use of color and organization of space that tempts the viewer into believing that the image is emerging into the church space.

On Thursday we immersed ourselves in Renaissance architecture. We visited Palazzo Venezia and the Cancelleria. We were particularly interested in the way that these palazzi incorporated churches, yet these churches were hidden within the overall plans of the buildings. In contrast to the early Christian structures we have been spending so much time in, this new arrangement of ecclesiastical space fueled the day's discussion.

La Quarta Settimana

Week four started off with a special visit to the Oratory of the Confraternity of the Gonfalone. We had a private entrance to the oratory, so we had the space all to ourselves, creating an ideal classroom setting to analyze the late sixteenth-century frescoes depicting Christ’s Passion. Up until this point, we have been observing spaces largely patronized by ecclesiastical entities. Visiting the oratory gave us the opportunity to engage with a different kind of patronage, that of a confraternity made up of laymen.

On Tuesday we met at the church of Santa Maria Maggiore. Erin presented on the early Christian nave mosaics depicting Old Testament scenes. She provided us with a provocative question: why choose Old Testament scenes in the largest church dedicated to the Virgin Mary? The combination of our first-time use of headsets plus Erin’s interesting prompts, proved to be a very production visit to Santa Maria Maggiore.

Tuesday’s session continued with trips to Santa Prassede and Santa Pudenziana. Upon arriving at Santa Pudenziana, we realized that a funeral was taking place inside the church and that we would have to wait until the service was over to continue class. This was a reminder to all of us that these spaces are not simply preserved moments in history, but actual functioning sites of religious practice.

Emma presented the early Christian apse mosaic at Santa Pudenziana, asking us to consider whether the figure of Christ was based on an emperor prototype or that of a pagan god. We had the great fortune to connect with Mario, the caretaker of the church. He gave us a special tour of the building, taking us upstairs to the clerestory level to view the impressive mosaic at a very close range. This was such an exciting treat for all of us that we continued class straight through lunch!

On Wednesday the students had their first midterm exam for the 400-level seminar. They all did extremely well, proving this kind of on-site learning is quite effective.

Thursday was our first trans-Tiber day. We ventured across the river to Trastevere to visit the early Christian churches Santa Maria in Trastevere and Santa Cecilia in Trastevere. In Santa Maria in Trastevere we discussed the use of spolia in the nave columns and the re-appropriation of antiquity for Christian purposes. We also examined the Pietro Cavallini mosaics of the life of Virgin in the space of the apse. We compared their thirteenth century style to that of the earlier mosaics we had seen previously in the week.

At Santa Cecilia in Trastevere, we viewed the fragmented Cavallini Last Judgment frescoes in the nun’s choir of the convent. We compared Cavallini's technique in frescoes to that of the mosaics we had just seen at Santa Maria in Trastevere. As we were viewing the frescoes in the space above the church, a wedding began to take place down below. We were able again to see a church space activated by its congregation. This seemed like an appropriate way to end our week of basilicas and mosaics.

La Terza Settimana

Week three was full of new content and new sites. On Monday we met in the classroom to discuss the transformation of the altarpiece. We centered our discussion around Raphael and Sansovino’s Saint Anne altarpiece in Sant’ Agostino. After establishing some context for the readings, we traveled to Sant’ Agostino together to view the work, as we so often now get to do, in person.

On Tuesday we met in the field in front of the Pantheon. Our nine o’clock meeting time granted us about thirty minutes of precious quiet with the ancient monument, before the throngs of tourists arrived. Rachel gave her site presentation, leading us in a discussion in the possible numerical interpretations of the architectural elements of the Pantheon.

We narrowly escaped the formidable crowd, hungry for photos of the dome and oculus. We slipped past them up Via della Scrofa to the Ara Pacis for our next site visit. Augustus’s Ara Pacis (altar of peace) had been under restoration for many years while a new building was constructed for the monument. The Richard Meier museum looks like a fairly standard modern building from the outside, but the white interior and ubiquitous windows create a beautiful viewing environment for the ancient object. Shannon led us in a discussion of the scholarly approaches to the Ara Pacis. We considered its iconography as well as its function as an object of ritual worship.

On Wednesday we met in the classroom initially to begin our discussion of Michelangelo’s Last Judgment. We dealt with the reception of the fresco within the changing climate of religious reform in the early to mid sixteenth-century. To continue this thread we packed our bags and walked up the street, once again, to Santa Maria sopra Minerva for a discussion of Michelangelo’s Risen Christ. Ryan led us in considering the possible viewpoints of this highly criticized sculpture. As it is not in its original position, we attempted to reconstruct the period-viewer’s experience of the work.

On Thursday our professors arranged for us a special treat – but it meant an early meeting time. At eight o’clock we gathered in front of the Rome Center to meet Bill Guillon, a local chef who had agreed to take us on a market tour of the Campo de’ Fiori. We learned where to buy fish, meat, eggs, milk, cheese, groceries and vegetables, all within a short walk from our school.

After our market tour, we fueled up on cappuccini and caught a bus taking us well outside the city walls to Santa Costanza and Sant’ Agnese Fuori le Mura. This day marked our transition in Art H 397 from ancient material to early Christian. At Santa Costanza we analyzed the fourth century mosaics, replete with potentially Dionysian imagery. At Sant’ Agnese, we were able to consider the transition of the Roman meeting house – the basilica – into the basic architectural plan of the early Christian church.

On Thursday night, our week of hard work was rewarded. We met at the Mamelli apartment and Bill the Chef rejoined us for a cooking lesson. We learned to make Penne all’Arrabbiata, pork roasted with balsamic vinegar and panna cotta. It was delicious. I think we all thoroughly enjoyed ourselves and we had the chance to properly celebrate Dabney’s birthday. Buon compleanno!

La Seconda Settimana

Week two of our program was a short week, but very rigorous and fruitful. On Monday we had presentations on-site from two of our five graduate students, Kit and Meg. We first traveled to Santa Maria sopra Minerva to view the Filippino Lippi's Carafa Chapel. Kit asked us to recall our reading on chapel and consider the strange placement of the patron in relation to the Annunciation. The patron seemed to be dividing the attention from the Virgin just as she is visited by the angel, Gabriel. This is a most unusual arrangement for such a scene.

The same afternoon we continued on to San Clemente for Meg's presentation on Masolino's Branda Chapel. We managed to all pile onto a Roman city bus together for a ride across town, catching views of the Roman Fora and the Colosseum on the way. When we arrived at San Clemente, the church was unexpectedly closed for another half hour. We decided to make a quick dash up the street to Santi Quattro Coronati, a medieval church home to a beautiful cloister and a well-preserved fresco cycle of the Donation of Constantine. Bonus church!

Returning to San Clemente, Meg led us in a discussion of Masolino's early fifteenth-century chapel for Cardinal Branda. We discussed the patron's specific architectural and narrative programs to communicate his presence in the church despite the fact that he spent very little time in Rome or in the church itself.

On Tuesday we had a whirlwind day of Etruscan sites with visits outside of Rome to Cerverteri and Tarquinia. We saw the round tumuli of Cerveteri and the sunken painted rooms of Tarquinia. We discussed the difficulties in studying a culture for which we have so little evidence and we engaged in the methodological issues of projecting our contemporary views back onto that of a society we do not totally understand yet. We had a great lunch in the town of Tarquinia, paired with a sarcophagi-rich trip to the Etruscan museum. It was a long day, but the weather was spectacular and everyone agreed it was a worthwhile addition to our study of Italian art.

On Wednesday we had another classroom day, which was a welcome respite after our Etruscan marathon. We did some preparatory work for our upcoming visit to St. Peter's by discussing Michelangelo's Roman Pietà. We also engaged in some challenging scholarship on Michelangelo's London Entombment, which ties into our continuing consideration of the changing status of the image and the altarpiece in the early modern period.

We were lucky enough to have our only four day weekend of the program this week. Many students took advantage of the opportunity to travel. We had groups visiting Pompeii, Naples, Vicenza, Bologna, and Barcelona.

La Prima Settimana

Benvenuti!

We had a busy first week of the program. On Monday our group began arriving bright and early at the UW Rome Center to move into their apartments. We have students living near the Campo de' Fiori, the Pantheon and in Trastevere. Everyone is spread out in the city, but all within easy walking distance to the UW Rome Center.

Monday night we went out for our first group dinner at Trattoria Moderna - a nearby restaurant, where the chef, Livio, updates traditional Roman fares. It was delicious. I think the dolci options were a particular hit with the group.

On Tuesday we had orientation at the UW Rome Center. The group had the rest of the day to continue settling into apartments, buy groceries, acquire cell phones, and orient themselves to their new surroundings.

Wednesday we had our first seminar meeting in the classroom. We had a productive and lively discussion, introducing our course on the transformation of the religious image. The material for this seminar was very challenging, but group participation was excellent, setting a positive academic standard for the rest of the quarter.

Thursday was an intense day in the field. We started by meeting the UWRC in the morning. The topic for the day was urban renewal and the layers of Rome - this being a fitting theme for our ancient day. Our route took us through the Jewish Ghetto, stopping along the way to see the the Theater of Marcellus. We were able to walk down next to the theater and pass through amongst the ruins. Our journey towards ancient Rome then led us to the Campodoglio and Santa Maria in Aracoeli. From these vantage points on the Capitoline Hill, we were able to get a sense of the way life in modern Rome continues to function and progress around and on top of its past.

We had our first student presentation led by Becca on Trajan's Column. Seeing the monument in person, we were able to assess and discuss our previous night's reading concerning the visibility of the sculptural decoration and the column's function as a funerary monument.

Next we traveled down Via dei Fori Imperiali to the hot bed of Roman tourism, the Colosseum. Our destination, however, was not the impressive Flavian amphitheater, but rather the Arch of Constantine. This was Anisha's presentation site. She raised interesting issues regarding the mixing of imperial Roman styles on the arch and the subsequent historiographic debates.

We had absolutely beautiful weather for our day traversing through ancient Rome. We can only hope for more bel tempo! Our maneuvering through the city as a large group has so far been successful and pleasant. Here's to many more site visits paired with lively discussions. Andiamo!

Program Description

Welcome to our program blog! We are embarking on the fourteenth year of the Art History Seminar in Rome, which for the first time will be co-taught by Professors Estelle and Stuart Lingo. The 2010 program seminar topic will be the transformation of Italian art in the Renaissance and Baroque periods (Art H 497); students will also study the art and architecture of Rome from ancient to modern times (Art H 397).

The Seminar's goals are fourfold: 1) to give our well-prepared students the opportunity to experience original works of art and architecture on site; 2) to study the rich artistic and cultural heritage of Rome and the Italian peninsula from ancient times to the present; 3) to facilitate small-group, collaborative, and in-depth learning; and 4) to provide students with a unique opportunity to grow as scholars through taking an active role in preparing, planning, and leading seminar discussions at sites in and around Rome.

The Seminar will be based at the University of Washington Rome Center, housed in the beautiful and historic Palazzo Pio in the heart of Rome. Built on the foundations of the Theater of Pompey, ancient Rome's first permanent theater (dedicated in 55 B.C.), the seventeenth-century palace incorporates a medieval tower and adjoins the Campo de' Fiori, site of Rome's most attractive open-air market.

Ci vediamo a Roma!